Kootut teokset | Samlade skrifter | Selected Works
Font size: A A A A


Viewing Options:

§ 10

Having thus, in the foregoing, compared the main proposals in the projected and so insistently demanded ordinance on servants with the general rights of humankind, let us now, dear reader, change our point of view and look at this system of servitude from another aspect, namely: to what extent may it be found to be compatible with the true interest of the kingdom and its inhabitants? This is a yardstick by which our political arrangements in particular are to be compared and then judged to be acceptable or not. Here, however, I should observe from the outset that we must not stand too close to this subject of our inquiry, for if we get involved in small individual advantages and drawbacks, we will not be able to grasp the overall position and context of the matter, nor too far away from it, where the entire system fades before our eyes into an indistinct shadow.

It is precisely on this aspect of the matter that many masters in every estate confront me with a general outcry: “The kingdom must perish owing to the wilfulness and extravagance of the servants and their vastly inflated wages. We cannot obtain servants, they do not work diligently, nor can a farmer afford to pay such high wages. The farmland of the kingdom must therefore return to fallow, no land reclamation can be considered, and the owners will be forced to abandon their properties. Such a loss to individuals must become a loss to the general public and ultimately to the entire kingdom: is it not then time to con-

sider a remedy before all is lost?”

That is how the situation looks when seen at close range, and such is the outcry that now drives forward the new ordinance on servants, and although there is much that one could say regarding each of these propositions, yet we may as well accept the truth of this and that the complaints are well founded, in order all the more effectively to get to the nub of the matter; but let us now step back a little, view the objective from a slightly greater distance and look for the real and natural sources of this evil, against which the protests are directed. We are then likely soon to discover that the cause of all this lies precisely in the regulations themselves and that the evil that is now to be remedied is a natural consequence of what has already been done and must become far worse should the published proposals be brought into effect. If this is found to be the case, one can only shudder at the thought of new fetters being prepared for the ruin of the kingdom: we observe the immediate evils, which are shortages and dearness, but we do not know their sources; we suggest remedies that will cure the evil by means of something far worse. Dear reader! lend your consideration to this matter and let love for humanity and truth make your conclusions unwavering. I dread the resort to blind blows in our enlightened times, which ought to be banished to the hideous bygone era of antiquity.

 

Previous Section:

Next Section:

Places:

Names:

Biblical references:

Subjects: